Site NavigationCase Study: Two Time Winner for Ticket Busters Client
|
|
Circumstances:
Louis B. is a Ticket Busters client who had previously had a case completely dismissed as a result of using Ticket Busters service.
Unfortunately for Louis B. he found himself ‘in the hot seat’ again.
On the day of the alleged violation, Louis was driving south bound on the 101 freeway at approximately 5:00 pm. There was a moderate amount of traffic on the roadway and the weather was clear. Louis was going with the flow of traffic and was within a pack of about 10 cars. The officer was positioned on the side of the road and did not have a clear view of Louis’ car due to amount of cars surrounding him. Also, modern cars tend to look alike and Louis believed that the officer had mistakenly targeted his vehicle.
Problem:
Although Louis was traveling at a safe speed with the flow of traffic, he was pulled over and cited for violation 22349 (VC).
According to DMV this violation description follows:
Maximum Speed Limit--22349. (a) Except as provided in Section 22356, no person may drive a vehicle upon a highway at a speed greater than 65 miles per hour.
(b) Notwithstanding any other provision of law, no person may drive a vehicle upon a two-lane, undivided highway at a speed greater than 55 miles per hour unless that highway, or portion thereof, has been posted for a higher speed by the Department of Transportation or appropriate local agency upon the basis of an engineering and traffic survey. For purposes of this subdivision, the following apply:
(1) A two-lane, undivided highway is a highway with not more than one through lane of travel in each direction.
(2) Passing lanes may not be considered when determining the number of through lanes.
(c) It is the intent of the Legislature that there be reasonable signing on affected two-lane, undivided highways described in subdivision (b) in continuing the 55 miles-per-hour speed limit, including placing signs at county boundaries to the extent possible, and at other appropriate locations.
Amended and Repealed Sec. 22, Ch. 766, Stats. 1995. Effective January 1, 1996. Repeal operative March 31, 1996.
Added Sec. 23, Ch. 766, Stats. 1995. Effective January 1, 1996. Operative March 31, 1996.
Amended Sec. 1, Ch. 20, Stats. 1996. Effective March 29, 1996.
Amended Sec. 41, Ch. 724, Stats. 1999. Effective January 1, 2000.
Solution:
Louis B. had used the TicketBust document filing service for a previous traffic ticket and he remembered how professional and competent the TicketBust staff was. He also remembered that the first traffic ticket was DISMISSED and his bail refunded…. [MORE ON TRAFFIC TICKET CASE STUDIES]
For more information on how Ticket Busters of California can help to beat your speeding tickets or fight other traffic tickets, visit TicketBust.com or call us today at 800 850-8038.
About the Author:
Steven Miller is the author of this article on Fighting
speeding tickets.
Find more information about Beating traffic tickets here.
Related Articles
Top 5 Motives to Use a Texas Traffic Ticket Attorney
The Merits of Cheap Conveyancing
Case Study Holiday Hassles End in Glee. How TicketBust Beat a Speeding Ticket and Saved Christmas.
Motor Vehicle Accidents Affecting Pedestrians In Crosswalks
The Numerous Purposes Of Massillion Directory
Forms for Right of Legal Guardianship
When Do You Need a Personal Injury Legal professional in Houston
American Missionary Charged With Kidnap In Haiti
Living Overseas You Still Need to Pay Your Taxes
Personal Injury Law General Information On Legal Issues
Car Accident Lawyer Selecting the Right Solicitor for the Job
Know Your Rights In The Fdcpa
Car Crash Claim 3 Things That Could Get You An Auto Accident Settlement
Penalties And Punishments For Dallas Dui Conviction
What Is A Shareholders Agreement
Genuine No Win No Fee Hospital Negligence Claims
